Quite some time ago already, we put up a post in which we asked our readers to submit questions for JaME. It took quite some time (we were secretly waiting for more questions!) but here are the answers, answered by various members of the team:
Wanze: It's not a big question, but I'm missing the direct link on your main page to this Weblog. Or I haven't found it yet.
Kay [English team]:
Sianface: I know the JaME team works hard on the site in keeping it up to date and accurate, but not everyone appreciates it: what does the JaME team as a whole think of the "anti-JaME" crowd?Actually, there is a link on the main page of JaME, and you can find it here in the menu:
However, and this is probably why you couldn’t find it, only a few versions have this link, not all of them. Also, the French and Finnish links lead to the weblogs of their own versions.
We’ve asked various JaME team members to answer this question, seeing as it’s hard to come up with one general statement. Also, as far as we know, there are multiple reasons for people not to like JaME. Here are a few thoughts and opinions that seem to represent what the JaME team is thinking about this the best.
Yura [French team]:
I think it's always easy to say something is bad, but JaME is full of people who work really hard, and I think it's still good that some people like their work and appreciate it. For the ones that don't, if they could tell us what's wrong, it would be more useful for all parties involved, instead of losing energy with starting an anti-something fight.
Yura-sama [German team]:
I personally don't care about "anti-sites," since I think it's a normal thing for people to come together to hate a "big enemy." I don't know why these people chose an information site as the object of their hate, and in fact I don't want to know, since I think that it is silly to hate a website. We're not a bad newspaper, that has a web-presence. And I never heard of any "wikipedia-haters,” so most probably these haters applied to the team but were not taken into the team, and are angry because of that.
Or their favorite band was "attacked" in a review for releasing a bad CD...is that a reason for hate? In my opinion, there are far bigger problems in the world than the one of not being satisfied with a site about Japanese music. And since the team is working hard to keep a high standard and even grow, I think it is very unfair to say that our site "sucks." It doesn't count only for JaME/KoME...it counts for any project that is kept alive by passionate people.
Matron [Finnish team]:
I find those sites amusing and I feel kind of proud since it shows we're really affecting them somehow. If we were just some small random meaningless site, people wouldn't have any opinion about us and the majority would probably be just "what's that? uhm, okay whatever." But however, I also find those sites sad because I'm a person who doesn't really understand the meaning "hating someone." Hate is such a strong word and it takes so much energy so I just can't understand people who HATE something 24/7; isn't that tiring?
In Finland, 99% of haters hate us because they're jealous. At least it strongly seems so. Yeah, unfortunately it's quite known we get some "extras" (though I still don't understand what's the big deal with interviews and so on; I mean, they're fun sometimes yes but gigs are much more fun? And you just get a pile of extra work so yay? Maybe I'm just the stupid one then. XD)
foXJapan [French team]:
Hmmm, when I talk with people, I think that they're very jealous. But they believe the worst ideas. The first is that when we work on JaME, we have free tickets for events and free CDs...and, automatically, the guys who believe these rumors become very jealous.
But one of things about it that makes me angry...no one seems to believe that working on JaME isn't easy and demands a lot of very important work after school...
Misomu [Swedish team]:
People tend to expect a lot from bigger sites. One mistake and you're out. They seem to forget that those working on the site are real people, and real people do make mistakes. If there's a mistake, why not tell us instead of wasting energy on dedicating a hate site? Those people either have way too much time on their hands, or they're really jealous.
Jess [American team]:
Every action and choice one makes in their life has a repercussion, be it good or bad. So JaME once had people who made poor decisions and "stole" information from other people, that was before, this is now. JaME has had it's grace period, taken the repercussion as a whole when it was only a few people's bad decisions; JaME has grown up and moved past that, people need to get over it D:
And about "stealing" information, it's kinda like... well, how did that person find out that info in the first place? It was announced live only? Well good, you and 500 other people heard. You're not unique, it's not "your" information, it's info belonging to the artist which it concerns. D: don't even get me started with the "stealing translations" thing. DX
The fact that people have anti JaME sites that STILL find things these days to pick apart, well kudos to them for being one of our many page hits. If they dislike JaME, drop the subject and leave us alone. Forget we exist. People keep talking about someone they dislike and keep tabs on them only because they have some sort of either jealousy or bitter issues. It's pathetic people have that kind of time to
devote to hateful things. To err is to be human. That's why the word forgive was made.
Kupo: My question is: no one will hire me due to my piercings and appearance, will JaME hire me please? XD ...no really? .-.
Kay [English team]:
In general, JaME doesn’t really care how the team members look like when it involves working on the site. However, when it comes to representing us in public, so with meeting companies, partners, bands, we do want our people to look professional and dressed smartly.
Sandra: I already asked several people but no one could ever answer my question: why is (was...?) it called "jmusiceuropA?" I was always told JaME was first a French project and even in English (all over known language, y'know) it would be a "europE". Why "A," where does it come from?
Reyep [JaME webmaster & creator of JaME]:
‘Europa’ originates from the ancient Greek word for the continent, in which it is spelled with an ‘a’ instead of an ‘e'. We chose this for two reasons: first of all, we didn’t want jmusiceuropa to sound too ‘English,’ it had to represent the whole of Europe. And ‘Europa’ sounded a little nicer than ‘Europe,’ more exotic in some way. ^^
However, nowadays we have dropped the names of ‘jmusiceuropa,’ ‘jmusicamerica' and ‘jmusiceastasia’ and we are jame-world together!
Pukurin: What do you think about the idea of people being SO against the use of Romaji titled tracks? It's that way a lot within the Last.fm communities. Like everything has to be in Katakana, Hiragana and Kanji?
Cage [English team & Tracklists manager]:
Personally, I use all forms of script when it comes to my music collection because I am learning the language at University. I may not know what all of the Kanji mean as it stands, but having them there helps me to recognize them. Regardless of language however, I tend to keep to original script, whether it be Russian, Korean or Chinese for example.
I do it because I have a fascination with language, not because of aesthetics or because I want to be "in" with the crowd. I personally find people who only keep the scripts as the "oh my God, look how much of a fan I am" type; the are people we could really do without. If people want to use Romaji, then by all means, go ahead.
If people have the frame of mind that romanized versions are "morally wrong," then my job on this site is practically worthless. With regards to romaji however, I have never heard anyone complain about the romanized lyrics found in the European releases of Japanese albums. Why should Romaji on online communities be viewed any differently? I think that if you want to use Romaji, then, by all means, go ahead.
Pukurin: What do you think about the idea of people strongly hating the term "JRock" or anything "J-"?
Yura [French team]:
I can understand people not liking this term because it's like saying "I-Rock" for Italian rock, or "F-Rock" for French rock, it's unfair...it’s as if saying that Japanese music can't only be rock, but only Japanese rock. But I always use the terms Brit-pop or French-rock or Chinese-punk, because culture and language are a part of the music. So I can understand that people hate those terms, but I can't say: oh man it's forbidden to use these words! Word are always useful to communicate, that's why we keep using them!
Misomu [Swedish team]:
I can understand that. Partly because people tend to label anything made by a Japanese band/artist as J-pop/J-rock, which would be like dividing all the music in the world into either pop or rock. Plus, it's loaded with stereotypes.
Another reason I think people might dislike the term is because it so strongly defines the music as "Japanese," as if that's the most important part. It's not pop, it's not rock, nor is it techno; it's Japanese. That kind of creates a border between Japanese music and music made in the rest of the world. But then again, it's a simple and easy way of explaining that you're talking about rock (pop/punk/whatever) music from Japan.
Jess [American team]:
I say J-rock, I say K-pop, but it's really only for one reason: listening to music in a variety of languages, it makes for an easier specific reference as to what I'm talking about. I don't feel that J-/K- anything is it's own specific genre of music, because music is it's own universal language. If the music sounds like rock, it's rock. Pop is pop, punk is punk, hip hop is hip hop, etc. The instrumentals decide the genre, not the language. As far as I'm concerned, adding the letter of whatever language the music is in means that and only that, it's not meant to degrade the music in any way.
So, if you also have a question for JaME, please post them and we'll do another Q&A session!
However, and this is probably why you couldn’t find it, only a few versions have this link, not all of them. Also, the French and Finnish links lead to the weblogs of their own versions. 

